My daily commute consist heavily of motorways, i have never driven fast in fact, love seeing my fuel gage static instead of dropping minute after minute... I have only ever had 1 car with cruise control before and to be fair, used it a lot! Set at 65/70 and bosh away i go... what i thought as a fuel saving exorcise...
But...
Now I'm going to own a car not only cruise control but with a speed limiter... now heres my theory!![Wink](https://forum.ds3club.co.uk/core/images/smilies/wink.png)
Cruise control is actually pretty poor at fuel consumption, example... Driving normally burns fuel, going down a hill lets off the throttle, saves fuel but going up a hill drives the car to the desired speed (burning fuel)
Speed limiter should be better on fuel, example... Driving normally saves fuel as can be driving below the set speed, going down a hill saves fuel as you cant go faster than set speed if anything slower, going up a hill you can manage your own speed and amount of throttle applied...
So there are my thoughts... any of your thoughts? evidence??
Chris :confused:
But...
Now I'm going to own a car not only cruise control but with a speed limiter... now heres my theory!
![Wink](https://forum.ds3club.co.uk/core/images/smilies/wink.png)
Cruise control is actually pretty poor at fuel consumption, example... Driving normally burns fuel, going down a hill lets off the throttle, saves fuel but going up a hill drives the car to the desired speed (burning fuel)
Speed limiter should be better on fuel, example... Driving normally saves fuel as can be driving below the set speed, going down a hill saves fuel as you cant go faster than set speed if anything slower, going up a hill you can manage your own speed and amount of throttle applied...
So there are my thoughts... any of your thoughts? evidence??
Chris :confused:
Comment