Tweet
Originally posted by Fabian
View Post
Thanks for information!
Will check this with the guy who tested the car.
If I look on the plot, It says there is 14% loss and 170,9 Hp
If I make the calculation, 170,9/114 = 1,499 x 110 (10% drivetrain loss) = 164,9Hp
So My car should be closer to 164 / 165 the 170hp
Think 164,9hp isn't bad at all?!
Will check this with the guy who tested the car.
If I look on the plot, It says there is 14% loss and 170,9 Hp
If I make the calculation, 170,9/114 = 1,499 x 110 (10% drivetrain loss) = 164,9Hp
So My car should be closer to 164 / 165 the 170hp
Think 164,9hp isn't bad at all?!
Take a look - I've also achieved about 163 HP in first run...
http://imageshack.us/f/560/wykreszhamowni.jpg/
...but I don'r take this serious...
Try to understand that such calculation is worthless! Your test was simply made wrong. You must do at least 3 runs - first is only to warm dyno bearings and it is unreliable - it gives false loss parameters. Only second and third runs will be valuable. Only then drivetrain losses can be correctly measured and verified. As you can see the next two runs gave me about 158 HP and I'm pretty sure that in your case it will be same or even less... Once again - the only way to check it in your case is to test it on a proper dyno in proper conditions...
Comment